My great friend and co-editor here at CCN is passionate…..even more so than me, about IV fluids.
With this, he has also been sharing his extensive, often dogma challenging, teaching vignettes on X.
We have popped all of this gold teaching onto one page here. This way, you can follow what’s been going on.
Thanks for taking the time to do all of this buddy! (Oh, BTW, it’s pretty obvious how to follow him on X!)
Jump to:
ALBUMIN
๐งตWhy does low protein intake cause hyponatraemia?
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) July 7, 2025
Most people find this confusing.
But the underlying physiology is beautifully simple.
Letโs walk through it ๐#Hyponatraemia #FluidBalance #MedTwitter #FOAMed pic.twitter.com/MvLZIwYfs9
๐งต Albumin in Critical Care: 70 Years, 700 Papersโฆ Zero Benefit
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) November 24, 2025
1/
Albumin is the most studied fluid in critical care.
Decades of trials. Endless meta-analyses.
And yet โ not a single clinically meaningful benefit.
Hereโs why the entire theory collapses once you understandโฆ pic.twitter.com/z1qes97PPG
ORGAN PERFUSION
๐งต "What really determines tissue perfusion?"
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) July 27, 2025
โ and why most explanations get it wrong.
Letโs sort out MAP, CVP, CCP, autoregulation, vasopressors, and the flow that actually reaches your organs.
๐ pic.twitter.com/b7faVYLXsV
PHYSICS OF THE CIRCULATION
๐งต Thread: Why cardiovascular physiology feels confusing (even to experts)
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) January 27, 2026
Part 1 of my 'The physics of circulation' series
Cardiovascular physiology isnโt confusing because itโs complex.
Itโs confusing because we routinely mix up description with causation. And our languageโฆ pic.twitter.com/PgrJv1tSjR
Pressure ๐งต
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) January 29, 2026
The physics of circulation part 2
We use the word pressure constantly in medicine (blood pressure, filling pressure, perfusion pressure).
And we usually treat pressure as an agent.
It isnโt.๐ pic.twitter.com/rdOvuUxtOH
Flow ๐งต
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) January 31, 2026
The physics of circulation part 3
We talk a lot about flow in cardiovascular physiology.
But our understanding is often weaker.
Flow isnโt a substance.
It doesnโt get pushed. pic.twitter.com/r6lRY9pbPU
Resistance vs Impedance ๐งต
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) February 5, 2026
The physics of circulation part 4
Weโre taught that resistance controls flow.
Sometimes that intuition works.
Often, in the circulation, it fails.
Hereโs why. ๐ pic.twitter.com/1moFADJMWz
Afterload ๐งต
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) February 16, 2026
The physics of circulation part 5
Afterload is tricky to understand.
It is not blood pressure.
It is not SVR.
It is not โhow tight the arteries are.โ
To understand it, we need to separate three things that are routinely blurred. pic.twitter.com/pKa9wnuSLj
Coupling ๐งต
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) February 21, 2026
The physics of circulation part 6
In the last thread we described afterload as โhow hard it is for the ventricle to ejectโ
Letโs sharpen that.
Mechanically:
Afterload = wall stress during ejection.
But whether the ventricle is appropriately matched to theโฆ pic.twitter.com/LBWDfEBuLL
๐งต What drives blood flow โ the heart or the vessels?
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) December 21, 2025
Eminent physiologists have argued this for decades.
The disagreement survives because of imprecise causality.
Hereโs the resolution ๐ pic.twitter.com/7Xkq5ByDgC
1/
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) June 27, 2025
Most people think the heart drives circulation.
But what if thatโs backwards?
Andersonโs model flips the whole idea of cardiac output on its head โ and it changes how you think about fluid, flow, and failure.
๐งต๐#physiology #FOAMed #MedTwitter #criticalCare #cardiacOutput pic.twitter.com/aRd20xVqyE
PRESSURE CONCEPTS
๐งต Preload is one of the most misleading terms in clinical physiology.
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) July 10, 2025
It shapes how we think, prescribe, and teach โ but itโs wrong in all the ways that matter.
This builds on Saturdayโs Starlingโs Law thread โ
๐ https://t.co/dYJMFYH2nk
Letโs fix it ๐ pic.twitter.com/YX6d7PNMyj
๐งต Afterload, resistance, and why the heart isnโt โpushing againstโ pressure ๐ pic.twitter.com/FEwAb3gPfs
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) January 7, 2026
๐งตWhat makes the blood go round?
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) December 17, 2025
And why does such a simple sounding question cause such heated arguments between physiologists?
Everyone agrees on the observations.
The disagreement is about causality. ๐#FOAMed #Physiology #MedX pic.twitter.com/CFUz5BFC6Z
๐งต Inlet impedance: the missing determinant of cardiac output
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) December 14, 2025
1/
What really limits cardiac output: the heart or the circulation delivering blood to it?
This question has sparked heated arguments between physiologists for decades.
To answer it, you first need to understand inletโฆ pic.twitter.com/ADO4D6ewpr
Left atrial โreservoir strainโ (LARS) is usually taught as an atrial property.
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) December 13, 2025
That framing fails physiologically.
LARS is best understood as a signal of ventriculoโatrial coupling. pic.twitter.com/nYGE54yiKH
๐งต What is Critical Closing Pressure โ and why does it matter for perfusion?
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) July 29, 2025
A thread to clear up one of the most misused and misunderstood ideas in circulatory physiology.
๐ pic.twitter.com/DtE1gK8VDt
FLUID DYNAMICS – MEDIEVAL CONCEPTS?
Why Iโm rethinking extubation timing in fluid-overloaded ICU patients (a physiology thought experiment ๐งต๐ pic.twitter.com/vdHMEAgxb7
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) January 5, 2026
๐งต Why you cannot be oedematous and hypovolaemic at steady state
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) November 14, 2025
โPuffy but intravascularly dryโ?
โ ๏ธThe most persistent myth in IV fluid therapy#FOAMed #physiology #MedX pic.twitter.com/OJFjOb11hW
1๏ธโฃWe talk endlessly about โcapillary leakโ โ but most of what we say about it is wrong.
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) November 6, 2025
Hereโs what actually drives fluid movement across the microcirculation โ and why Starlingโs model needed an upgrade. A ๐งต๐ pic.twitter.com/r3V0ciCPyW
1๏ธโฃ
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) November 9, 2025
We can remove fluid at rates up to 12 mL/kg/h and blood pressure often holds.
That limit isnโt arbitrary โ it comes from dialysis data showing steep rises in hypotension and mortality above it.
It marks the upper boundary of how fast plasma can be refilled from theโฆ pic.twitter.com/aJb9yK3Uqm
๐งต Why itโs so hard for the body to get rid of IV fluid
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) October 25, 2025
1๏ธโฃ Hook:
We talk endlessly about โfluid resuscitationโ โ but far less about how the body gets rid of excess fluid once weโve given too much.
Hereโs the physiological problem ๐#MedX #Physiology #Fluids pic.twitter.com/lrKHyf2rHW
WEST ZONES RE-THOUGHT
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) January 6, 2026
CARDIOVASCULAR CONUNDRUMS
1/
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) August 29, 2025
Not all heart failure is low-output.
Sometimes the heart pumps harder than ever โ and still fails.
High-output failure explained ๐งต#FOAMed #MedX pic.twitter.com/ioJzEScz29
๐งต The Cardiac Function Curve โ why it misleads (Part 1)
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) October 10, 2025
1/
The cardiac function curve is one of the most recognisable images in physiology.
Unfortunately, itโs also one of the most misdrawn, mislabelled, and misunderstood.
Letโs redraw it โ and see what it really tells us aboutโฆ pic.twitter.com/cDRMT5jO4z
๐งต Part 2 โ The Venous Return Curve
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) October 13, 2025
1๏ธโฃ
Last time, we fixed the cardiac function curve.
Now letโs look at the other half of the story โ venous return โ and how the circulation really feeds the heart.#FOAMed #MedX #physiology pic.twitter.com/0wh0dEy8JS
๐งฉ Part 3 โ Why you usually canโt move one curve without the other
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) October 16, 2025
1๏ธโฃ
So far, weโve treated the cardiac and venous return curves as two lines that meet.
In theory, you can move one without the other โ and sometimes thatโs true.
But in physiology, they almost always move togetherโฆ pic.twitter.com/3aV20c61iF
1/
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) September 16, 2025
SVR looks precise: (MAP โ RAP)/CO.
But this neat number hides traps. Itโs not โafterload,โ itโs not pure โtone,โ and sometimes itโs not even valid.
A thread on why systemic vascular resistance misleads โ and when it still helps. ๐งต #MedX pic.twitter.com/WBNumH8m3G
FLUID FOIBLES
1/
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) June 8, 2025
You might think:
"Why give NaCl to someone overloaded with salt and water? Shouldnโt we be pulling sodium out, not putting it in?"
๐ง๐ง
It feels wrong โ but correcting chloride can unlock natriuresis.
Letโs break the paradox. ๐งต pic.twitter.com/OpjS8MMu1l
๐งต1/
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) June 21, 2025
Hypovolaemia is the most overdiagnosed concept in medicine.
We say it reflexively โ especially in sepsis.
But hereโs the uncomfortable truth:
We canโt measure blood volume.
We infer it.
Often wrongly.
Letโs unpack why that matters. ๐#MedTwitter #FOAMed pic.twitter.com/x2l76OvbMw
1/
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) July 24, 2025
IV fluids have two main purposes:
๐ง To maintain daily needs
๐ To replace losses
(Weโll come back to whether we should even use the term 'resuscitation' fluid in a future thread).
Letโs talk about maintenance fluids โ when theyโre needed, and when theyโre not.
๐งต #MedXโฆ pic.twitter.com/NXHUAdKExo
1/
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) July 31, 2025
Last time we tackled maintenance fluids โ what the body needs day to day. https://t.co/l8xX11eiHs
Now letโs talk about replacement fluids โ what to give when somethingโs been lost.
Same volume. Same composition. Thatโs the key.
Letโs keep it physiological. ๐ง
1/ ๐ Resuscitation fluids โ life-saving in true hypovolaemia.
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) August 15, 2025
Give them for the wrong reason and you harm patients.
Weโve covered maintenance & replacement fluids โ now the trilogy ends with resuscitation. Hereโs how to get it right. #MedX pic.twitter.com/EirSmA1N52
1๏ธโฃ
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) October 6, 2025
Some patients with severe venous congestion have almost no oedema โ and thatโs confusing at first.
It only starts to make sense once you unpack the physiology. ๐ https://t.co/iOrlhwTXYg
1/
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) September 12, 2025
Why do we keep reaching for IV fluids, even when we have evidence they can cause harm?
It's not based on physiology โ itโs cognitive bias.
๐งต pic.twitter.com/VKCI7X3S5p
We give fluids for problems they canโt fix โ driven more by cognitive biases than physiology. Important thread from @Turningthe_Tide ๐https://t.co/Nhy5a9IL9Q
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) August 23, 2025
๐งต Hypertonic hyponatraemia: when low sodium isnโt a sodium problem
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) July 19, 2025
1/
Not all hyponatraemia is created equal.
Most cases are hypotonic โ from too much ADH or too little solute (e.g. low protein states).
But high glucose causes hypertonic hyponatraemia โ a water shift, notโฆ pic.twitter.com/9Ro2WFP60E
๐งFluid creep accounts for more fluid than resuscitation in ICU.
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) July 13, 2025
But nobody prescribes it โ and most donโt even notice it.
The truth?
๐งจ Most ICU patients donโt need routine maintenance fluids.
Hereโs whatโs really going on ๐๐งต pic.twitter.com/VmDCVaX39a
SHOCK-ING TRUTH!
1/
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) August 16, 2025
Shock isnโt โgive fluids, then pressors, then inotropes.โ
That recipe misses the physiology.
Hereโs how to manage shock properly: ๐งต#MedX #haemodynamics pic.twitter.com/T4AWzqgHVK
1/
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) July 13, 2025
Shock is complex. But our tools are often simplistic.
This paper proposes a new model:
๐ฉธ Four circulatory interfaces that must stay coupled to maintain perfusion.
Uncouple any one โ and shock worsens.#Shock #MedX #FOAMcc
Hereโs the framework.
๐ https://t.co/8xxEcdzYUw pic.twitter.com/YQhvW62MJZ
๐ โGive a fluid challenge โ see if we can get the norad down.โ
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) July 9, 2025
Weโve all heard it. Boluses are often given just to reduce vasopressor doses.
Why?
โข Fear that pressors are harmful
โข Pressure to keep patients off ICU
But topping up to drop the norad might not be the best moveโฆ pic.twitter.com/DjShOi9XUJ
STUDIES!
๐งตโThresholds, consensus & physiologyโ
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) September 4, 2025
Decades of critical care research have produced few reproducible breakthroughs.
Maybe the problem isnโt our interventions โ itโs that we reduce patients to syndromes, instead of treating them as individuals with distinct physiology.
๐งต Part 2. Heterogeneity vs Colliders in Critical Care RCTs
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) September 6, 2025
1. The puzzle
Critical care RCTs keep failing.
The usual explanation?
โPatients are too heterogeneous.โ
Thatโs partly true โ but thereโs a deeper problem.
Part 2 of a 3-thread series on why ICU trials fail and whyโฆ
๐งต Part 3 โ Why ICU RCTs fail (beyond colliders)
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) September 12, 2025
1. The puzzle
Decades of critical care RCTs.
Huge effort. Tens of thousands of patients.
Very few reproducible breakthroughs.
This is Part 3 of my series on why ICU trials fail โ and why physiology must guide us. pic.twitter.com/IdQFJWWAwl
LAWS, TRUTHS and HISTORY
1/
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) June 28, 2025
Fluids can harm.
But fluids also save lives.
Letโs talk about the life-saving side of fluid therapy โ from IV resuscitation in cholera to global oral rehydration campaigns. ๐ง๐งต#MedTwitter #FOAMed #CriticalCare pic.twitter.com/urewwzQeRf
๐งต Starlingโs Law: Misunderstood, Misapplied, and Still Misleading
— Ashley Miller (@icmteaching) July 5, 2025
1
๐จ โStarlingโs Law explains how the heart increases cardiac output.โ
Youโve probably heard this a thousand times.
But itโs wrong.
Or at least – very incomplete.
Letโs fix it.
Because this matters – for heartโฆ
๐ซ What happened to ARDS?
— Turning the Tide (@Turningthe_Tide) June 14, 2025
20 years ago ARDS was everywhere.
Now we rarely see it.
We didn't cure it.
We just stopped causing it.
Hereโs how IV fluids quietly created (and solved) an epidemic of iatrogenic lung injury ๐งต pic.twitter.com/1On4NlBEkJ
We hope you enjoyed this section!
JW

@wilkinsonjonny
Share this:
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn



































